Cookie banner

This site uses cookies. Select "Block all non-essential cookies" to only allow cookies necessary to display content and enable core site features. Select "Accept all cookies" to also personalize your experience on the site with ads and partner content tailored to your interests, and to allow us to measure the effectiveness of our service.

To learn more, review our Cookie Policy, Privacy Notice and Terms of Use.

or
clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Good looking people who don't live in DC

By Danica Lo

Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to Vox.com, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.

Here's the slide show that the Washington Post is using to argue that Washington, DC, isn't "Hollywood for ugly people"—their words, not ours! The thing is, we're not sure the slide show makes for a very convincing argument since, by our count, only three of the nine photos WaPo uses feature people who take up even seasonal residence in DC. Like, seriously, do Justin Bieber, Kim Kardashian, and the entire Today Show team count for DC? What do you think? [WaPo]

More From Racked