Cookie banner

This site uses cookies. Select "Block all non-essential cookies" to only allow cookies necessary to display content and enable core site features. Select "Accept all cookies" to also personalize your experience on the site with ads and partner content tailored to your interests, and to allow us to measure the effectiveness of our service.

To learn more, review our Cookie Policy, Privacy Notice and Terms of Use.

clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Louboutin, 1. YSL, 0

Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.

Even though the judge in the Christian Louboutin vs. YSL case made that "nice shoes" comment in regards to YSL's evidence, some documents didn't make the cut. A chart that YSL tried to include, which listed red-soled shoes the brand has sold from 2004 onward, was tossed out. Louboutin's lawyer, Harley Lewin, said it was "a bald attempt of YSL and counsel to circumvent the law and sneak into evidence the chart they acknowledged was a demonstrative' at the July 22 hearing." No verdict has been made yet, so it's still unclear as to whether or not you can truly copyright a color. [WWD]