Cookie banner

This site uses cookies. Select "Block all non-essential cookies" to only allow cookies necessary to display content and enable core site features. Select "Accept all cookies" to also personalize your experience on the site with ads and partner content tailored to your interests, and to allow us to measure the effectiveness of our service.

To learn more, review our Cookie Policy, Privacy Notice and Terms of Use.

clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Louboutin on Why Red and the H&M Collection That Will Never Be

The man and his signature color, via Getty
The man and his signature color, via Getty

Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.

Grazia popped in on Christian Louboutin last week at London's Design Museum, where a selection of his legendary heels are on display in celebration of the brand's 20th anniversary, to ask him a few of their dire questions—namely whether a high-street collab or a womenswear collection are at all possibility. "No," to both was his irrevocable answer, citing quality as the most important factor in his designs and shoes as his first and only love.

He did, however, offer some insight on his choice to make red his signature color saying, "Even if you don't like colours, you will end up having something red. For everyone who doesn't like colour, red is a symbol of a lot of culture. It has a different signification but never a bad one." He was probably thinking of his soles, but maybe not his soul, since he's clearly not considering who else sports a signature red in some cultures.

· Christian Louboutin Talks Womenswear and Lower-Priced Lines At The Design Museum [Grazia]
· Louboutin Lipstick Is Coming, and It Will Probably Be Red [Racked]
· "Toe Jobs" Are a Thing [Racked]