Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to Vox.com, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.
Image via Tyler Olson, Shutterstock
No stores want to go on the record admitting that, of course, but Sportie LA co-owner Isack Fadlon conceded that the concept is officially on the table. "We're probably going to come to a point soon where we have enough customers coming in and doing this where we'll have to have a policy [to address it]," he said. "It wouldn't be to challenge [customers] in a stern manner, but it would be to ask them why [they are doing this] and convince them to make the purchase now. If it's a price issue, we may have to match it if we can."
Actually, price-matching would be a game changer if brick-and-mortar stores can swing it. Target is already giving it a stab, having announced back in January that they will now matching Amazon prices in all locations.
As we wrote at the time, with a reported 82% of shoppers engaging in showrooming, an Amazon price-match could potentially reverse that trend. It would be a huge advantage to customers, since they would get the best of all world's: in-store customer service, cheapest price, and, with no wait for shipping, immediate gratification.
We're curious: What do you think? Do you showroom? Would you pay $25 to try on a pair of shoes? Is it fair for stores to charge try-on fees? Speak your mind in the comments.
· Retailers Combat Showrooming [FN]
· Are You Guilty of Showrooming? [Racked]