via"> clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Burberry Responds to Claims of Toxic Chemicals in Childswear

Image <a href="http://www.designscene.net/2012/12/romeo-beckham-burberry.html">via</a>
Image via

Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to Vox.com, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.

British luxury brand Burberry responded to allegations brought about by those meddling Greenpeacers that "hazardous chemicals" were found in the spring 2013 line. Specifically, they identified a high level of nonylphenol ethoxylates (NPEs) in the purple metallic shirt (recently modeled by Romeo Beckham). The chemical, once degraded into nonylphenols (NP), can disrupt hormones. Science, right?

"All Burberry products are safe and fully adhere to international environmental and safety standards," Burberry's official statement reads. "We have an active programme dedicated to reducing the environmental impact of our supply chain, working in collaboration with our suppliers and NGOs. Greenpeace is aware of our work, which includes the commitment to eliminate from our supply chain the release of chemicals that have an environmental impact."

Chih An Lee, Greenpeace East Asia Detox campaigner called it "a nightmare for parents everywhere looking to buy safe clothes for their children" regardless of expense.
· Burberry Responds To Toxic Chemical Claims [Vogue UK]
· Mango Follows Zara's Lead in 'Toxic Detox,' Victoria's Secret Still Holding Out [Racked]
· Victoria's Secret Promises to Go Green by 2020 [Racked]