Cookie banner

This site uses cookies. Select "Block all non-essential cookies" to only allow cookies necessary to display content and enable core site features. Select "Accept all cookies" to also personalize your experience on the site with ads and partner content tailored to your interests, and to allow us to measure the effectiveness of our service.

To learn more, review our Cookie Policy, Privacy Notice and Terms of Use.

or
clock menu more-arrow no yes mobile

Filed under:

Would You Rather: Jimmy Choo Bubble Wrap vs. Glossier Bubble Wrap

Photo: Instagram
Photo: Instagram

Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to Vox.com, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.

Fashion is very into turning something cheap into something fancy right now.

Fake Vans sell for $400Vetements has whipped $17 Champion sweatshirts into frenzy-inducing $700 hoodies, and now it looks like Jimmy Choo's selling a $950 version of Glossier's packaging.

The beauty brand's pink bubble wrap pouch has morphed into a must-have. Glossier's founder and CEO Emily Weiss, and Man Repeller's Leandra Medine, were both photographed carrying theirs around Paris during fashion week. I have bills and balms stuffed into one in my bag right now, and I spotted one tucked underneath a stylish arm at the Bowery Hotel Bar this past weekend. That's enough to make it a thing, and enough for someone on high to notice, add a few zeroes, and sell a fancy version.

Of course, Choo's is a real bag, meant to last longer than a minute, with a silver chain and satin lining while Glossier's packaging is ephemeral (or not, at least, designed to withhold the beating of a regularly used bag). But Glossier's is free with purchase or, as of today, $20 for a pack of five.

You can get 100 6 x 9 zipping bubble bags for $40, but this might be the one time it's worth paying the pink tax.