clock menu more-arrow no yes

Filed under:

Hey Brands, This Is Actually the Way to Show How Your Clothing Looks on Humans

Your pants come in multiple sizes, so show models of multiple sizes.

Elizabeth Suzann

Racked is no longer publishing. Thank you to everyone who read our work over the years. The archives will remain available here; for new stories, head over to Vox.com, where our staff is covering consumer culture for The Goods by Vox. You can also see what we’re up to by signing up here.

Today, Nashville-based brand Elizabeth Suzann announced their “Diversity Campaign,” a project that aims to solve a problem as old as e-commerce.

In short: Elizabeth Suzann will now show every item of clothing in their Signature Collection on models who represent every size in which the item is available. This is, to put it bluntly, fucking huge (sorry, Mom! But I think you’ve heard me say worse things in an Anthropologie dressing room).

Online shoppers have long-struggled with the whole “can’t try things on” part of e-commerce. To this end, we’ve had high-quality images of an item, usually from a few angles, with the ability to zoom in. Maybe there’s a spinnable 360 view, which is very fun. Some sites even specify the size of the model, her height and measurements, which is, at least, a touch. But when you go to say, Shopbop, and look at a classic, Diane Von Furstenberg dress on a classic, size zero model and try to reason out, “Okay, so, on me that’s uh...” you remember that no one is that good at math.

At a size 12, I personally find that it would be just as relevant to look at a dress I wanted to buy on a notably large banana or a bunch of balloons that have a lot of personality as on a size zero model. Her body has nothing to do with mine. And that’s not a personal failing on my part. Even if I were a size six, her body would have very little to do with mine.

Ultimately, that’s the problem. Most designers and even mall-brand stores don’t want to show their clothing in a non-optimal light, and their clothing looks non-optimal on women of minimally-variable sizes. How this became a problem with the women and not the clothing is a society-wide gaslight that we need to extinguish once and for all. Showing clothing on women of every size, admitting that these bodies are real and not going anywhere and deserve to be dressed well, is a great first step.

To be fair, Elizabeth Suzann did not totally invent the concept of showing models of multiple sizes, whole cloth. Everlane features models of every possible size for their Slouchy Trouser. Everlane says in an email to Racked that they’re happy with how this turned out, and might revisit this concept in the future. And that’s nice! But it’s one pair of pants! To just celebrate this single gallery and not worry about seeing other items of clothing on bodies of every size means accepting the lip service given to non-sample size women; it means not daring to ask for real visibility. And that’s what Elizabeth Suzann is offering.

This doesn’t mean that now all our problems are solved. Elizabeth Suzann only offers up to a size 16, which is just above the national average (I’m at least good enough at math to know that means there are lots of women larger than that). Suzann herself “definitely” has plans to offer larger sizes, however, explaining in an email to Racked, “Grading patterns up and down is an art... I want to make sure that I’m keeping the silhouettes balanced and flattering for every size and reflect women's body shapes accurately. Once we nail it down, we’ll extend sizing on all of our products!” The brand recently expanded from offering up to a size 12, to offering up to a 16, and added OS plus and OS minus sizes to “one size” garments, as well as tall and short pant lengths.

Of course, there’s still every other brand on the internet and beyond to conquer. But in a fashion world that throws plus size women crumbs and acts like that’s not confirmation we’re still being judged on our size, this is real progress.